Stop redesigning the whole funnel to fix one page

How a single simplified form lifted Vela Systems’ demo completion rate 13 points.

DIGITAL EXPERIENCES

3 min read

A pale stone staircase climbing along a plaster wall, with a sharp diagonal beam of sunlight cast above the steps

When a funnel underperforms, the instinct is to redesign the funnel. Usually, one step is doing all the damage.

Finding the one page that’s actually broken

End-to-end conversion is the number everyone watches, and it’s the least useful one for finding a problem. It tells you that people are leaving. It doesn’t tell you where. A funnel that converts badly overall can be made of four steps that work well and one that quietly loses most of the people who reach it.

The way to find that step is to look at the drop between each pair of stages, not across the whole journey. Most steps lose a predictable share of visitors; that’s normal. The one to look at is the step that loses far more than the steps around it — a sudden cliff instead of a slope. In our experience it’s almost always a single page, and often a single form on that page.

Redesigning everything around that cliff tends to make things worse. It changes the steps that were working, resets the baseline you’d need to measure the fix, and takes months. Repairing the one broken step takes weeks, and you can tell whether it worked.

What was wrong with Vela Systems’ demo form

For Vela Systems, the cliff was obvious once we looked for it. Visitors reached the demo page at a healthy rate. Then most of them left without booking.

A single low plaster step built into the corner of an empty beige room, lit by a curved slice of sunlight from an arched window

The demo form asked for eleven fields before anyone had seen the product working: company size, fleet size, current software, budget range, timeline, role, and more. Each one made sense to the sales team, because each one helped them decide how to run the call. None of them helped the visitor get to the call.

Most of those questions were there to qualify the lead, not to schedule a first look. The form had been built to answer the sales team’s questions at the exact moment the visitor was deciding whether Vela was worth their time.

A form doesn’t need to know everything about a lead before it’s earned a conversation.

What changed, and what didn’t

The form was cut to the three fields needed to book a demo: name, work email and a preferred time. The qualification questions didn’t disappear. They moved to a short follow-up step shown after the booking was confirmed, when the visitor had already committed and was far more willing to answer.

Nothing else in the funnel was touched while the test ran. The landing pages, the pricing page and the product tour stayed exactly as they were, which is what made the result readable: demo completion rose by 13 points, and the sales team still received the information it needed before each call.

Fix the page that’s bleeding before you touch the pages that aren’t.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.